June 14, 2024

The government has commenced a consultation on draft regulations to support the implementation of the first tranche of Quality of Advice Review reforms. 

On 11 June, Treasury announced the commencement of the consultation process on the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes) Regulations 2024 (draft regulations).

These are consequential amendments to support the implementation of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes and Other Measures) Bill 2024, and the first part of the government’s response to the Quality of Advice Review.

The paper comes ahead of a public hearing on the legislation which is scheduled to be held on Thursday 13 June.

The draft regulations:

  • support written information or documentation requirements for the purposes of section 99FA of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) to continue to be met electronically
  • remove requirements related to Fee Disclosure Statements, update record keeping obligations for new consent requirements and remove references to civil penalties which are removed in the Amending Bill
    align requirements for Financial Services Guides and Website Disclosure Information and make other consequential amendments
  • streamline the regulations for conflicted remuneration in line with the changes to the Amending Bill
    ensure the informed consent requirements apply for benefits given in relation to a general insurance product where personal advice is provided.

All interested parties have until 8 July to provide their feedback.

The government introduced the first tranche of the DBFO bill to Parliament in March. While a majority of the bill is uncontroversial and attempts to scrap some of the red tape that has overwhelmed the profession in recent years, advisers have opposed suggested amendments to Section 99FA of the SIS Act, which appear to dictate that superannuation trustees must review clients’ statements of advice (SOAs) before they can satisfy members’ requests for payment of advice.

The bill has been greenlit by the House of Representatives and is now under consideration by the Senate economics legislation committee.

Both the Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) and the Financial Services Council (FSC) have called for explicit changes to the bill’s provisions to ensure the regulatory burden on trustees and advisers does not increase.

The Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has clarified that it was not his intention to create additional checks. Instead, he has insisted that the policy intent was simply to continue current practices – a risk-based sampling approach.

Speaking at ifa’s Adviser Innovation Summit last week, Sarah Abood, CEO of the FAAA, shared that the government has amended the bill’s explanatory memorandum (EM) to clarify that it does not require a rigorous review of each SOA. However, she noted that maintaining the bill in its current form means the issue persists.

The concern is that if the wording remains unchanged, some trustees may interpret it as requiring more rigorous checks, thereby adding unnecessary red tape to the process.

“Our strong preference is that these changes be made in the law itself because it’s challenging practically to always have to read the EM,” Abood said.

“We think it would be far clearer and more explicit to make that change in the legislation itself and we continue to argue for it.”


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *